Bmore Bikes You Tube Twitter Facebook Group

Baltimore’s Next Big Bike Project


December 2nd, 2010 | Categories: Infrastructure | 18 comments

The Southeast and Park Heights Bike Networks are near completion.
The Guilford Ave bike boulevard’s design is complete with construction eyed for early summer.

So, what’s next? 

If you look at a map of Baltimore’s existing bike infrastructure, you’ll see a massive void in the heart of the city, generally bordered by Monroe St, North Avenue, Edison Highway and the harbor. 

What streets in this area would you like to see bicycle improvements on?  (Please keep in mind that DOT is focusing on bike lanes and boulevards with signed routes. No more sharrows!)


  • Anonymous

    My pick would be something that connects the Jones Fall Trail’s downtown section (Guilford) with Harford Avenue (later Road). There’s a fair amount of east-west bike infrastructure in northeast Baltimore (Lake Montabello, Herring Run park) but very little north-south. If there was a way for people to bike down from Hamilton/Lauraville to downtown, I think you’d see more ridership coming from that area. The entire area around Old Town Mall is a bit of a mess, but some bike lanes there could at least make it navigable for bicyclists looking for a low-traffic alternative to get to downtown.

    If you’re looking for a smaller project, bike lanes on Broadway from North Avenue to the Harbor would be really nice, as you would connect a major employment center (Hopkins), the redevelopment project north of the Hopkins complex, and Fells Point. You could even connect it to Loch Raven, Kirk and Harford through Bonaparte Avenue, which is also pretty low traffic.

  • Youssef

    How about Howard Street? It’s already a poor choice for auto traffic due to the light rail. Adding bike lanes there probably wouldn’t be as controversial as adding them on another North/South hotspot.

    As for East/West, it may not be practical from a political standpoint, but route 40 seems the next logical step.

  • Liam

    There was this meeting about Howard Street earlier this week – http://baltimorevelo.com/2010/11/260000-in-additional-funds-for-howard-street-revitalization/

    It doesn’t pertain directly to bikes, though.

    I agree that Howard street needs serious attention, even if it doesn’t involve bike infrastructure. The speed limit on Howard Street between North Avenue and MLK is 25 miles per hour. 25.

  • http://www.orangeconeproject.com Paul Day

    I’m glad we’re taking a position on sharrows.

  • http://twitter.com/1fluffhead Billy Dewar

    From Hampden extending bike lanes coming down Remmington, quick Right on W. 30th, then Left onto Huntingdon Ave to connect with 25th street to allow riders to pick up downtown routes on Maryland, St. Paul or Guilford. This would be an almost continuous route from Hampden/JHU campus area to downtown by simply adding onto the sharrows already in the JHU/Hampden area. Huntingdon also has the very wide lanes. I have often thought that those lanes would be ideal bike ways without really affecting parking or traffic flow in that area.

  • Allan

    I agree about more north-south options. Perhaps extend Guilford towards the harbor, or Calvert/St Paul (turn St. Paul’s “now you see it, now you don’t” bike lane into a continuous path). Greenmount is another option.

    East-west: a continuous link from Mount Vernon to the Monument Street lane, perhaps via Centre. A lane on Madison so that once you go east on Monument, you can get back.

  • Anonymous

    A bike lane on Gay Street that accommodates Northbound bicycle traffic from the downtown area to connect with the Fallsway, and by extension the bicycle infrastructure network – somehow.

    Some sort of safe connector between the inner harbor bike lane and southbound Light Street into Federal Hill that aren’t actually pedestrian crosswalks (which we’re technically expected to dismount and walk to use to not be held responsible for any collisions with motor vehicles, regardless of actual fault).

    Perhaps a bicycle track on Maryland Ave.

    Bicycle lanes on Mt. Royal.

    I’m not familiar with the complete design of Guilford Ave., but perhaps a southbound bike lane on Guilford between Mt. Royal and Pratt Street.

  • http://twitter.com/jedweeks Jed Weeks

    I like all of these suggestions (Especially the MD Ave cycletrack) and the Remington ones below.

  • Liam

    Apparently, Mt. Royal will have bike lanes, at least near MICA, within the next couple of years.

    Actually, I have only heard them described as “bike travel lanes”, and in Baltimore, a couple poorly placed sharrows seems to count for that.

  • Soholeon

    why no more sharrows? just curious

  • Anonymous

    Well, for starters, 80% of Baltimore’s sharrow markings were placed incorrectly well within the door zone and often partially underneath parked cars. Any inexperienced riders who may try to ride above the markings are in far greater danger than had the sharrow marking never been painted. Any experienced rider that rides 5 feet from parallel parked cars may potentially infuriate any drivers who think the sharrow makings designate proper cyclist lane position (which, as painted, is well within the door zone). Poorly placed sharrows have the opposite effect of their intended objective. Beyond that, all roads are sharrows anyway and I’m dubious as to whether they compel motorists to drive more courteously. I’ve certainly never felt more respected because of them, and was once intentionally driven off the road on a sharrow marked lane.

  • http://bike.baltimorecommutes.com Nate Evans

    Nail on the head, guestymcspanky. Plus, they have a 3 year life expectancy at $350/ea. so they’re not economical

  • http://bike.baltimorecommutes.com Nate Evans

    don’t worry, Liam, they’re bike lanes, not sharrows

  • http://twitter.com/slueck seth w. lueck

    I’m just curious as to the city’s vision of the “preferred” north-south passageway.

    i don’t think there is a main northbound street that is terribly cyclist friendly. here are my issues: on charles, the area near cazbar is not straightforward and sketchy (i got doored), and the cobblestones shortly afterwards are equally frustrating.

    then you have calvert. the right turn lane around the Baltimore Sun is pretty stressful. i never feel all that comfortable in the center lane or the right. and when you get to charles village, the lines do seem very narrow.

    that said, i don’t know if president st. to fallsway is the recommended path at this point — it seems like it is — but the president st. bike lane is frankly wholly unsafe. car drivers make right turns quite frequently without regard for the bike lane, and it’s really stressful as a cyclist. to add insult to injury, i honestly feel like the actual installation of the lane itself is hurting cyclists much more than it helps. i don’t feel comfortable riding in the 3 foot asphalt portion of the lane, so instead i opt to take a whole lane.

    i am sure drivers resent it, and i just hope the city recognizes it. so, my vote is for a more efficient northbound route.

  • Anonymous

    On President St.: While I’ll agree that President is far from ideal, self-defense against right hooks is not a particularly difficult maneuver. Well, on a long stretch of road it is difficult, because it involves slowing to ~12mph and heightened awareness for something that is unlikely to happen for dozens or hundreds of potential right hooks, but President is only about two hundred yards with right hooks only possible at Stiles, Pratt, Baltimore and Fayette. There are no parked cars and the visibility of cyclists to motorists on the asphalt portion is pretty strong. Like I said, President is certainly far from ideal, but I think the trick to using it safely is going slower and heightening awareness for 200 yards. As for taking the lane there – well, that’s one road that I would never have had the courage to take the lane on before the installation of the bike lane. It may suck, but it sure beats riding up High Street and fighting the uncrossable median curbs on Fayette, or riding on the sidewalk around the homeless church and the cobblestones around the Shot Tower, which is what I had to do before.

    But President to me is only good for connecting Fells Point and SE with the bicycle infrastructure grid. I completely agree with you that there needs to be a more efficient route connector between the harbor and points north that doesn’t involve crossing President St. (in all honesty cyclists will never do that, no matter how hard the DOT tries to encourage it). My vote for that is to allow the Inner Harbor bicycle lane to function as a hub with safe connecting bike routes projecting out like spokes. I agree that Charles and Calvert are both fundamentally flawed for that, and a better option would be to install a bike lane on Gay to connect from Pratt to the Fallsway, and to install a true and complete bike lane on the Fallsway past the prison all the way up to the corner of Guilford and Mt. Royal.

  • Bruce

    I agree that Maryland Avenue would be a great spot for bike lane. Once they build the new Wal-Mart in Remington, there will probably be an increase in traffic on the Charles Village section of Maryland so it’s important to protect this street, which is already a sort of unofficial bike route.

    Charles Street northbound from Mount Royal to University seems pretty ideal, especially with the planned Charles Street redevelopment north of 25th.

    And really anyplace that has a short bike lane should be extended. It’s pretty frustrating to be riding along a bike lane, only to be spit out into a busy road after just a few blocks.

    Also

  • Katie

    Cheers for no more new sharrows!

    Is there a way to make the biking route around Druid Hill Park clearer? I have attempted to bike from South Baltimore to Mt. Washington several times to visit friends but always, always, always get lost in Druid Hill Park. As a result, I end up biking up one of the busier streets where the cars go too fast for me to feel comfortable.

  • JesseH

    I know I’m coming to this conversation late, but I would love to see bike lanes added on Franklin and Mulberry Streets in West Baltimore– between the West Balt. MARC station and, say, MLK Blvd. The streets are wide enough that lanes should fit, and without lanes, it can be dangerous because autos tend to speed through those streets and aren’t expecting cyclists.

 

 


The views and opinions on this website are those of the author and not of the City of Baltimore or the Department of Transportation. For official Baltimore City DOT news, please visit this page.